gunviolence

Dr. Sinclair Grey asks why isn’t anyone serious about ending gun violence?

gunviolence

By Dr. Sinclair Grey III

Gun violence is no stranger to what’s happening in the inner cities. The number of killings in Chicago, Washington, DC, and other major metropolitan areas can’t help but raise eyebrows as to why this problem continues to occur, but little attention is brought to it. Permit me to say that the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School as well as what happened inside a movie theatre in Aurora, Colorado will forever be stitched in the minds of everyone. National attention was given to the shooter and the victims. Without a doubt, we must remember the lives of the innocent. However, I’m concerned that national attention isn’t given to crimes within inner city communities. Is it racism? Is it prejudice? Is it that black and brown people don’t really matter?

Dr. Gloria Brooks, a professor of Criminal Justice at the University of Maryland, College Park reiterates to her class that crime has no zip code. In other words, no matter where you live, criminal activity is always possible.

As we look at what’s happening in today’s world, the lack of adequate employment along with a host of other social ills can contribute to gun violence. Should we give people a pass for using gun violence because they have a problem? Of course not. However, we need to address some of the emotional/psychological issues people are dealing with on a daily basis. It’s only after innocent lives are lost that the mental health of the shooter is examined. Waiting to examine the mental health of the shooter when in many cases it was evident from the outset that there was a problem, brings about significant harm to so many people.

Having worked in the human services industry, I can attest to the stress many social workers face everyday. Along with the stress, the lack of financial support for programs can make it seem impossible to help those who need help to get the help they so desperately need.

The time for people to work collectively is now. It doesn’t matter one’s educational, social, or political status, crime affects all of us. The days of saying it’s an inner city problem or it’s a black problem are over. So many people want to preach that we are living in a post-racial world, but fail to reach across the street to the poor and disenfranchised.

When many buildings in the inner city are either boarded up or run downed, the spirit within that community is crushed. Dr. Kristal Owens-Gayle of the Empowerment Center in Maryland calls this ‘the broken-glass syndrome’, which simply means the more broken glasses and trash debris you see in a neighborhood, the greater the threat for crime. This problem cannot be overlooked. Simply moving further out to the suburbs won’t fix the problem. Cleaning up the neighborhood and establishing programs that will empower, educate, and elevate people from the inside out will help diminish gun violence.

The real solution begins when all of us to come together for a common cause. The cause is ending gun violence and the best way to begin is to do what Malcolm X said, ‘leave your religion at home.’ Whatever your religion, spirituality, or faith maybe, at the core of every ideology is love. When love is manifested, change can begin.

We need to stop pointing fingers. Whether it’s the media, politicians, or the entertainment industry, we (the people) need to educate ourselves and those around us about the need to practice peace and non-violence. In addition to praying for peace, we must make it a reality.

Gun violence in the inner city is just as important as gun violence in any other neighborhood. The lives of one group do not outweigh the lives of any other group. As we care about what happened in Sandy Hook and Aurora, let’s care about what’s happening everyday through varies communities.

Dr. Sinclair Grey III is an inspirational speaker, motivator, radio personality, author, organizer and liberator of persons from all intellectual, social and cultural walks of life. He is a committed advocate for change. Email: drgrey@sinclairgrey.org. Follow on Twitter @drsinclairgrey

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

One comment

  1. A Jewish judge removed custody of a 2 year old child from his mother placed him with his Jewish father.   

    The judge refused to appoint a gaurdian ad litem in the case.  The Judge gave the father all decision making regarding the child with the exception of religion which would be “joint”.   The Jewish Judge also gave the father custody of the child on all major Jewish holidays and gave the mother zero Christian holidays.  The Judge also granted the father who is born in Russia with family in Israel to apply for a passport.  The mother is concerned that she may never see her child again.  The mother, who had resigned from work when the child was 3 months, was then ordered to pay child support. The father had no witnesses in the courtroom and there was no jury.
     

    The father now alienates the child from his mother.  He can be heard screaming for her via recorded conversations when she attempts to speak with him on the phone before the husband hangs up for her 1 call per day allowance.

     

    The father was also arrested for raping the mother after she filed for divorce.

     
    Please respond to email so that awareness can be raised.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>