Huge Differences in Clinton and Trump Health Care Proposals

The health care reform plans proposed by Hillary Clinton would add boost coverage to as many as 9.6 million more Americans, while under Donald Trump’s proposal, as many as 25 million people would lose coverage, according to a new analysis.

Clinton and Trump have vastly different ideas for how they would change the health care system. While discussions on health care have been largely absent from the campaign trail, Clinton has said she would want to tinker with the Affordable Care Act – the health reform law signed by President Obama – Trump has said he would scrap Obamacare all together.

Researchers at the RAND Corp. made their determinations by analyzing various proposals made by the candidates so far this year. The report was conducted by RAND for the non-partisan Commonwealth Fund.

The researchers also found that the candidates’ plans would have dramatically different effects on health plan out-of-pocket costs. Clinton’s proposals reduce those costs for some people who get their insurance through the online state health insurance exchange by as much as one-third. Meanwhile, Trump’s proposals would increase out-of-pocket costs for these customers on the individual insurance market by between $300 to $2,500.

Incidentally, the average out-of-pocket costs for plans on the individual exchanges is $3,200. And the RAND analysis also showed that Trump’s proposal to make all insurance premiums for plans purchased on the individual market tax-deductible would actually end up lowering out-of-pocket costs for higher-income families.

Both candidates’ plans would add significantly to the national deficit. Clinton’s plans would add around $90 billion to the debt. On the other hand, Trump’s ideas would add about $41 billion to the federal deficit.

Jonathan Block

Jonathan Block

Jonathan Block is an associate editor at BioCentury, which provides news and information about the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Prior to joining BioCentury in 2019, Jonathan worked for MedShadow as content editor. He has been an editor and writer for multiple pharmaceutical, health and medical publications, including The Pink Sheet, Modern Healthcare, Health Plan Week and Psychiatry Advisor. He holds a BA from Tufts University and is earning an MPH with a focus on health policy from the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy.

Did you find this article helpful?

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Latest News

Belviq, ActiPatch, Free Samples, Dollar Tree Drugs

Belviq, ActiPatch, Free Samples, Dollar Tree Drugs

We knew it was too good to be true – free and cheap drugs aren’t worth it. Also, taking a magic pill to lose weight could give you cancer (!). One ray of sunshine: a pain therapy device using shortwave is now available over-the-counter. Have a lovely Valentine’s Day! Be…

Flouride, PPIs, Breast Density and Prostate Cancer

Flouride, PPIs, Breast Density and Prostate Cancer

Startling news about fluoride, a study encourages more limites use of PPIs, does knowing the density of your breasts matter, and vegetables aren’t helpful in warding off prostate cancer (darn).  Be Well.  Fluoride and Pregnancy The medical community was shocked at the conclusions of two new studies on fluoride’s effect…

  • Advertisement